Austin Clark, CFA, has been asked to analyze White Goods Corporation, a $9 billion company that owns a nationwide chain of stores selling appliances and other electronic goods. As part of his analysis of the White Goods Corporation, Clark's supervisor, David Horvath, asks Clark to forecast White Goods' 2009 sales using multiple regression analysis. The following model was developed: sales = 20.1 + 0.001 GDP+ 1,000.6 TR + 0.1 CC -3.2 PC -40.3 UR t-values: (1.1) (2.3) (1.75) (3.2) (-0.48) (-0.9) Number of observations: 76 Standard error estimate: 15.67 Unadjusted R2: 0.96 Regression sum of squares: 412,522 Error sum of squares: 17,188 Independent Variable Descriptions GDP = gross domestic product TR = average coupon rate on 5-year U .S . Treasury securities CC = most recent quarter end consumer confidence index value PC = previous year's sales of personal computers UR = most recent quarter end unemployment rate Variable Estimates for 2009 GDP =8,000 TR = 0.05 CC =97 PC = 60,000 UR = 0.055
Critical Values For Student's t-Distribution
Clark's supervisor asks him to prepare a report explaining the implications of the regression analysis results. Clark writes the following conclusions concerning regression analysis in his report: Interpreting the results of regression analysis can be problematic if certain assumptions of the ordinary least squares framework are violated. The regression output for White Goods Corporation is unreliable for the following reasons: Finding 1: The correlation between regression errors across time is very close to 1. Finding 2: There is a strong relationship between the regression error variance and the regression independent variables. In this multiple regression equation, a potential statistical issue is:
Nigel Holmes, CFA, is an investment manager for a small money management firm in London. All of Holmes' clients are citizens of the U.K. Holmes urges all of his clients to maintain internationally diversified portfolios. In his efforts to find undervalued securities, he is currently analyzing a Canadian company called Slapshot, Inc. Slapshot produces hockey equipment at its Canadian manufacturing facilities. About 85% of Slapshot's sales are to the U .S . market, and the remainder are domestic (i.e., in Canada). Sales have been growing at 12% per year. Last year's sales were C$68,000,000. Holmes has gathered the following market information (inflation is perfectly predictable): * /$ spot exchange rate = 0.8 * /C$ spot exchange rate = 0.4 * U.K. risk-free rate = 6% * U.K. expected inflation rate = 4% * Canadian risk-free rate = 9% * Canadian expected inflation rate = 7% * U .S . risk-free rate = 4% * U .S . expected inflation = 2% Holmes uses the international CAPM (ICAPM) to value international investments. For Slapshot, Holmes believes that the stock's returns are sensitive to the /C$ exchange rate. In order to apply the model, he estimates the following parameters using the as the base currency: * World market risk premium = 6% * Sensitivity of Slapshot to the world market = 1.2 * Sensitivity of Slapshot to changes in the /C$ exchange rate = 1.4 * Holmes' expectation for the depreciation of the C$ against the = 2% * The ratio of the price of the U.K. consumption basket to the Canadian consumption basket is 0.3. Holmes adds Slapshot stock to several client portfolios at a purchase price of C$ 100. One year later, the stock is trading at C$ 122. There were no dividend payments during the year. If the real exchange rate remained constant, the GBP () return on Slapshot for Holmes' clients is closest to
Ron Natin heads a committee that oversees the USA Insurance portfolio with total assets of $25 billion. The portfolio has 15% of total assets allocated to foreign investments, which include both international stocks and bonds. The committee has adopted a position that the domestic markets are efficient and thus, has indexed the domestic portion of the portfolio. Each unique asset class in the domestic portfolio has been benchmarked individually. The committee believes that foreign markets are less efficient and utilizes active managers for this asset class. The foreign allocation is 60% stocks and 40% bonds. The committee has divided the foreign stock portfolio equally among three different managers. The committee closely monitors the risk level of these managers by reviewing their portfolio betas (current betas: 1.1, 0.95, and 1.3). As part of his committee responsibilities, Natin is required to review all reports and speeches prepared by other members of the committee before they are presented to the public. One of the committee members, Mclanie Henley, has submitted a speech on the subject of international diversification and the international capital asset pricing model (ICAPM) that she will give to a group of MBA students at a local university. Following are excerpts from her proposed speech: International investment and diversification is an important concern in money management and, of the many relevant issues to discuss, there are two key insights that I will Take time to explain. First of all, it is essential to realize that the currency exposure of a foreign stock investment is the sensitivity of the stock price to a change in the value of the local currency and that a positive correlation between stock prices and the local currency would mean that the local stock price increases as a result of a depreciation of the local currency. Second, as future asset managers you should realize that improvements in a foreign nation's economic activity that result in an increase in real interest rates will decrease bond prices, but will be offset by an appreciation of the home currency. The ICAPM is similar to the domestic CAPM in several ways. For example, both models assume that investors are risk-averse, preferring lower levels of risk and greater expected returns, that all investors have the same expectations for the risk and return of every asset, and that all investors should hold some combination of a risk-free asset and the market portfolio. The IGAPM is a useful construct to determine asset prices in a global context. Strategies that depend explicitly on asset prices derived from the ICAPM can rely on these asset prices even if currency hedging is inhibited in certain markets by legal restrictions on such activities. The committee monitors the investments of its equity managers by modeling the expected returns of each individual stock. The model used is (he ICAPM. One such stock, a Swiss medical equipment manufacturer, has a world beta of 1.2. The world market risk premium is 4%, and the Swiss franc offers a risk premium of 0.5%. The currency exposure is 0.5, and the applicable risk-free rate is 5%. The expected return on this stock according to the ICAPM model is closest to:
Paul Durham, CFA, is a senior manager in the structured bond department within Newton Capital Partners (NCP), an investment banking firm located in the United States. Durham has just returned from an international marketing campaign for NCP's latest structured note offering, a series of equity linked fixed-income securities or ELFS. The bonds will offer a 4.5% coupon paid annually along with the annual return on the S&P 500 Index and will have a maturity of five years. The total face value of the ELFS series is expected to be $200 million.
Susan Jacobs, a fixed-income portfolio manager and principal with Smith & Associates, has decided to include $10 million worth of ELFS in her fixed-income portfolio. At the end of the first year, however, the S&P 500 Index value is 1,054, significantly lower than the initial value of 1,112 set by NCP at the time of the ELFS offering. Jacobs is concerned that the four remaining years of the ELFS life could have similar results and is considering her alternatives to offset the equity exposure of the ELFS position without selling the bonds, Jacobs decides to offset her portfolio's exposure to the ELFS by entering into an equity swap contract. The LIBOR term structure is shown below in Exhibit 1.
After hearing of her plan, one of the other partners with Smith & Associates, Jonathan Widby, feels it is necessary to meet with Jacobs regarding her proposed strategy. Mr. Widby makes the following comments during the meeting: 'You should also know that I am quite bullish on the stock market for the near future. Therefore, as an alternative strategy, I recommend that you establish a long position in a 1 x 3 payer swaption. This strategy would allow you to wait and see how the market performs next year but will give you the ability to enter into a 2-year swap with terms that can be established today should the market have another down year. If, however, you choose to proceed with your strategy, know that credit risk for an equity swap is greatest toward the end of the swap's life. Thus, analysts tracking your portfolio will not be happy with the added credit risk (hat your portfolio will be exposed to as the swap nears the end of its tenor. You should think about what credit derivatives you can use to manage this risk when the time comes.' To offset any credit risk associated with the equity swap, Widby recommends using an index trade strategy by entering into a credit default swap (CDS) as a protection buyer. Widby's strategy would involve purchasing credit protection on an index comprising largely the same issuers (companies) included in the equity index underlying the swap. Widby suggests the CDS should have a maturity equal to that of the swap to provide maximum credit protection. Evaluate, in light of the appropriate equity swap strategy for Jacobs's portfolio, Mr. Widby's comments regarding the credit risk and use of swaptions in Jacobs's portfolio.
Sampson Aerospace is a publicly-traded U .S . manufacturer. Sampson supplies communication and navigation control systems to manufacturers of airplanes for commercial and government use. The company operates two divisions: Commercial Operations and Government Operations. Revenues from the Government Operations division comprise 80% of Sampson's total company revenues. Revenues for other companies in the industry are also driven primarily by sales to the U .S . government. Sampson has gained a reputation for offering unique products and services. Sampson's market share has been increasing, and its net profit margin is among the highest in its industry. As part of its business strategy, Sampson seeks out opportunities to enhance internal growth by acquiring smaller companies that possess new technologies that would allow Sampson to offer unique products and services. To this end, Sampson CEO, Drew Smith, recently asked his acquisitions team to consider the purchase of a controlling interest in either NavTech or Aerospace Communications, both software applications firms. Smith provides his acquisitions team with an aerospace analyst's industry report that addresses many key issues within the industry. Selected passages from the report are reproduced below: Sales in the aerospace electronics industry depend primarily on government military spending, which, in turn, depends on defense budgets. Sales depend on commercial travel to a much lesser extent. The government defense spending budget outlook is fairly bleak as the current administration is looking for ways to reduce the budget deficit. We feel the commercial airline segment has more upside than downside, especially as the global economy improves, so we might see a gradual shift in industry focus toward the commercial airline sector. Companies that already have a foothold in the commercial sector are well-positioned to grow during the global recovery. Even so, companies in this industry will remain highly sensitive to government spending for their revenues. Research and development costs are high and the industry is highly capital intense. While there are only a few companies in this industry, good opportunities exist, especially for companies that have developed sustainable profits through wise acquisitions, cost containment, and the ability to secure long-term government contracts. Sampson Aerospace recently announced that it is reducing its investment return assumption on its pension assets from 6% to 5%, and that it has entered negotiations to possibly acquire controlling equity interests in communications software firms, NavTech and Aerospace Communications. NavTech recently has decided to capitalize a significant portion of its research and development expense, and Aerospace Communications has restructured and reclassified many of its leases from operating to financial leases. Sampson CEO Drew Smith recently announced that Sampson had dropped out of negotiations with Knowledge Technologies, claiming it was likely not a sustainable business model.
Consensus forecasts for NavTech and Aerospace Communications are presented in Exhibit 1.
Assuring that NavTech is valued according to the constant growth dividend model, the market expectation of dividend growth implied by NavTech's current stock price is closest to: