Universal Containers has multiple minor and major releases in a year .Minor releases have sample
configuration changes, while major releases involve large number of complex code components. What is the
deployment tools should an architect recommend for both types of releases?
Universal Containers (UC) is developing a custom Force.com application. The following tools are used for
development, the Force.com IDE for developing apps. Git as a source control system and a Git repository, and
the Force.com Migration Tool for updating sandboxes from source control. UC's current branching strategy
calls for two main branches: 1) Master 2) Develop Three supporting branches: 1) Feature 2) Release 3) Hotflix
Consider that the branching strategy is in parallel as follows Feature |Develop |Release |Hotfix |Master What is
the recommended practice strategy that Developers should adopt for Development?
Universal Containers (UC) has integrated with their on-premise billing system using Salesforce Connect. The
data is configured using an External Object in sandbox. UC wants to deploy the external object to production
using the Metadata API and would like to know what Metadata types to choose for deployments to production.
Which two options are valid metadata types related to deployment of external objects? Choose 2 answers.
TechGiant Inc. has recently executed a Salesforce release containing a multitude of new features, automation rules, and data models. Post-release, they aim to validate if the end-to-end workflow functions correctly from the initiation of a lead in the system to its conversion.
What test execution methodology should they prioritize?