The SIAM Project Board has decided that a big bang implementation approach is unsuitable for ZYX
What is the most likely reason for this decision?
-ZYXS will be the service integrator
-The development teams from ZYXS and ZYXUK will merge to provide application development and support
services
-OUTSCO will provide a centralized service desk the wide area network and local area networks
-ZYXD will provide hosting services
-MAILSCO will provide e-mail services
-MOBSCO will provide desktop support for all users
The strategy is to transfer the current services to these named service providers as the legacy contracts expire
The CIO wants to ensure that the tooling strategy supports the corporate strategy
What would be the most appropriate tooling strategy*?
The corporate strategy of ZYX contains these objectives:
-Ensure delivery against contracts
-Invest in and tram all ZYX staff
-Reduce operating costs
-Be ready to adapt to change
The ZYX strategy requires that the costs of the service integrator should be as low as possible, and that service
levels and high-quality services should be achieved at all times. The CEO wants the new SIAM model to be in
place as soon as possible
OUTSCO is a global provider of a range of services, including service integration They have a good reputation
as a flexible and reliable service integrator who is willing to amend their SIAM model. They are in the last
year of a 10-year contract to provide outsourced services to ZYXUK. Over the last two years the performance
and quality of their services has decreased
SIAMRUS is a global provider of service integration services in the manufacturing sector They use a
standardized SIAM model with limited flexibility SIAMRUS recently created an outline SIAM strategy for
ZYXUK: proposing that they should be the service integrator.
ZYXS is experienced in the service management of corporate services including managing the delivery of
service providers The ZYXS IT Director used to be a senior service manager in a small service integration
company The ZYXS office location is almost at capacity with no possibility of expansion ZYXS are the
developers of NEWBNK, which is strategic to the future of ZYX
The CEO wants to retain as many of the existing service providers as possible
Which is the most appropriate structure and sourcing approach for choosing the service integrator for ZYX?
ZYX has now appointed SIAMRUS as the service integrator and has started to plan and build the new SIAM
ecosystem Initially the new SIAM model will be supported by the existing service providers.
In a recent program progress meeting, it was highlighted that the planned Organizational Change Management
(OCM) initiative has a high cost
What approach should be taken to ensure that the OCM initiative for the service providers will cost effectively
support the transition to SIAM?
Which are the most important governance requirements to initially focus on, given the situation of ZYX?
© Copyrights DumpsEngine 2026. All Rights Reserved
We use cookies to ensure your best experience. So we hope you are happy to receive all cookies on the DumpsEngine.
